Criteria for critiquing a research paper

Any limitations of the study, including bias, should be clearly presented.

how to critique a research proposal

Are the results clearly presented? Are the tests of significance interpreted using the appropriate degrees of freedom?

How to critique a research article

Final Thoughts Undertaking a critique of a research article may seem challenging at first, but will help you to evaluate whether the article has relevance to your own practice and workplace. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the study? Are the instruments appropriate for measuring the intended variables? Graphs and tables should be clear and promote clarity of the text. Instruments 1. Was every hypothesis tested? Results Results should be statistically analysed and presented in a way that the average reader of the journal will understand.

Is each instrument described in terms of purpose and content? How was the data analyzed?

nursing research article critique example

If an instrument was developed specifically for the study, are administration, scoring or tabulating, and interpretation procedures fully described? Are recommendations for future research made?

Did the researcher discuss or account for any potentially confounding variables that he or she was unable to control for?

Criteria for critiquing a research paper

Are the tests of significance described appropriate, given the hypotheses and design of the study? Design and Procedure 1. Were there threats to the reliability and validity of the study and were these controlled for? Does the sample size meet the suggested guideline for minimum sample size appropriate for the method of research represented? Things to consider in this section are: What sort of sampling technique and size was used? Are the results clearly presented? Is the method of sample selection described one that is likely to result in a representative, unbiased sample? Publication bias can occur when editors only accept manuscripts that have a bearing on the direction of their own research, or reject manuscripts with negative findings. If appropriate, are subtest reliabilities given? Are theoretical and practical implications of the findings discussed? What is are the major finding s? This will demonstrate how the study is capable of achieving its aims.

Things to consider in this section are: What sort of sampling technique and size was used? Are the size and major characteristics of the sample described? Instruments 1.

How to critique a qualitative research paper

Are theoretical and practical implications of the findings discussed? Is reliability discussed in terms of type and size of reliability coefficients? Was every hypothesis tested? If an instrument was developed specifically for the study, are the procedures involved in its development and validation described? Did the researcher discuss or account for any potentially confounding variables that he or she was unable to control for? Describe the reliability and validity of all the instruments used. Are the size and major characteristics of the sample described? Did the researcher discuss or account for any potentially confounding variables that he or she was unable to control for?
Rated 5/10 based on 98 review
Download
How to Critique a Research Article