Ugc grant thesis publication

The UGC is expected to respond in June.

ugc research grant

Reports of unethical practices in publishing of research papers, leading to an increase in the number of predatory, dubious and low-quality journals have been surfacing over the years, which was why the study was initiated,Patwardhan said.

UGC has admitted that it received several complaints about the inclusion of low-quality journals soon after the release of its approved list of journals on June 2, If they are not bothered then how can any regulation improve quality?

Ugc care list

Papers published in the disqualified journals will not be considered valid. Unfair delays Mukund Thattai, a computational biologist and head of academic activities at the National Centre for Biological Sciences in Bengaluru, thinks the recommendations are a good idea. But he agrees that publication incentives create issues when they promote proliferation of poor-quality papers. Can a circular from Delhi applicable to all institutions improve the quality of work? Getting published in disciplines such as mathematics or biology can take more than a year, he says. That precisely is what happened in India after the UGC made paper publication prior to thesis submission mandatory. This must change, bottom-up and top-down.

Move on. But the natural sciences and the life sciences in particular are not on the fast-track. Out of the 1, journals studied, were disqualified from the UGC- approved list of journals by the human resource development ministry for providing false information such as an incorrect ISSN International Standard Serial Numbermaking false claims about the impact getting published in their pages would have, indexing in dubious databases, poor credentials of editors and non-availability of information such as an address, website details and names of editors.

According to current UGC regulations, a PhD student is required to publish at least one paper in a peer-reviewed journal before thesis submission.

The publications can come in due course, or not," Prof. This must change, bottom-up and top-down. Engineering, the ecological sciences, the humanities each have their own timelines.

Ugc approved book publishers list

A biased review committee could accept a substandard thesis, whereas requiring a publication usually ensures at least some external peer review, says Gautam Menon, a computational biophysicist at the Institute of Mathematical Sciences in Chennai. Not just but unfair as now," he concludes. Balaram says. Engineering, the ecological sciences, the humanities each have their own timelines. Representative image A requirement that scholars get at least two research papers published in a University Grants Commission-approved journal before submitting their doctoral theses, coupled with pressure on university teachers to get their research published regularly in academic periodicals, has produced an unexpected side-effect: It has led to a proliferation of dubious journals. VijayRaghavan says. Students would always find a way to break the regulation," Prof. But the natural sciences and the life sciences in particular are not on the fast-track.

But last year, the UGC appointed a committee of researchers from the sciences and humanities to examine this requirement, among others.

The Indian government has previously promised to crack down on predatory publishers. Papers published in the disqualified journals will not be considered valid. Balaram thinks that institutes awarding PhDs should be held responsible for maintaining academic standards.

Rated 9/10 based on 17 review
Download
UGC to review quality of PhD thesis for doctoral degrees